Featured Post

Review: Leatherstocking Golf Course (Part 1)

Most people who visit Cooperstown, New York, are going to see the National Baseball Hall of Fame. It is the obvious reason to visit the town...

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Richland Golf Club Review

The par 4 2nd
That's right, more golf! Hey, it was another weekend with excellent weather, how could I not play some golf? The course at hand today is Richland Golf Club in Middletown, Maryland, and I played it on Monday, February 20th. This is a course that I have never played before, and to be perfectly honest, I probably won't be playing again for a while, if at all. In season, it's out of my price range, and there's a big, big problem with the course. The routing is terrible. Obviously, I don't know why exactly that is, but I have my suspicions. I think real estate came before golf integrity. Yes, it's one of those kind of courses. There are houses all over the place, occasionally flanking both sides of holes.

The par 3 4th
Naturally, the routing suffers because housing came first. The holes are disjointed, and the site is very hilly. I used Golfnow to make my tee time, which means I got a cart, and for once, I was kind of glad I had it. This was not a walking-friendly golf course, and for me, that's a bad thing. The disjointed golf doesn't just mean you get holes a long way from each other, but you also get a bunch of holes crammed together awkwardly. On the back nine, we go from par 5 to par 3 to four straight par 4's, all of which are similar in length. The first 3 (12, 13, and 14) run parallel to each other, are dead straight and basically completely flat. Taken in isolation, I actually liked those holes, and the 15th hole is semi-blind from the tee, and blindness in any form is something you don't see often enough. But together? Those holes lose some of their charm, and become more tedious than enjoyable.

The par 3 6th
Of course, most people don't care about routing. Not when you have a cart. The only reason I noticed was because I was thinking about it. The course itself was in excellent condition, and despite its flaws, I enjoyed a good number of the holes themselves. Maybe it was just because I was playing fairly well. Hit a lot of good drives, and I would have done better than 79 if I had remembered how to putt. And I will say this: the complimentary yardage book was a fantastic touch. And not just because it was necessary on a few holes, it was genuinely useful and informative.

As for the golf course itself, the front nine is significantly hillier. It starts off pretty difficult, with a long par 4 that I would say is the second or third hardest hole on the course. It's not an easy start. The fourth hole, a downhill par 3, features a stone wall and is visually appealing. The ninth hole is shorter than the first, but I would say it's more difficult, especially into the wind, the way I played it. There's a big ravine that splits the hole in half, and reaching that ravine was even more difficult into the wind. Admittedly, my drive wasn't very good, but I still had 190 yards left on my second. Then I hit a fantastic shot, one of the best iron shots I've hit in a while. Didn't make the birdie putt, but still, it was a nice way to end the nine.

The par 4 13th
The back nine is a lot flatter and more compact, as I've mentioned. It plays near a creek, which comes into play on a couple of holes. The nine begins and ends with par 5s, the 10th is downhill, reachable, with no water, which, on paper, I played in a very standard fashion. Green in regulation, 2 putt par. That misses the topped drive. But I managed to recover, obviously. The last hole plays uphill, is also reachable, and has water in play near the green which I managed to hit in 2 and birdie. Only birdie I had during the round. I've already talked about the four par 4s, and the other hole of note is the 17th, another long par 4 with a ravine running across the hole. I do not like that hole, it's too narrow, it's got OB on the right, and too many forced carries on a course are just annoying to deal with. I parred the hole, but still, it's not a good hole.

I paid 33 dollars to play this golf course at 11 AM on a holiday. Was it worth the price? I mean, I guess, but I wouldn't play much more than that for a housing-development friendly golf course. It really does spoil the design and the routing. I want to say that the course looks good, and without the houses, it would.

I also played Glade Valley Golf Club this past weekend, and I liked that course more. I didn't get any pictures of that course, I was playing with three random people, and I will definitely play that course again. So there's that to look forward to, right?

UPDATE: I can't believe I didn't remember this when I was writing this at first, but just how appropriate is the name Richland for a golf course? It just makes too much sense.




No comments:

Post a Comment