Featured Post

Review: Leatherstocking Golf Course (Part 1)

Most people who visit Cooperstown, New York, are going to see the National Baseball Hall of Fame. It is the obvious reason to visit the town...

Monday, November 21, 2016

Make Bunkers Hazardous Again

This looks way too nice.
Professional golf needs to be more interesting. People with cookie cutter swings win on cookie cutter golf courses, all set up to immaculate perfection. Maybe a few are more difficult than others, and weather can have dramatic effect, but on a typical sunny afternoon on the PGA Tour, you can expect to see lots of birdies, and the drama must rest almost entirely on which golfer is putting the best. And that's just not that exciting.

So, what can be done? Well, you could go the U.S. Open route and make the rough ridiculously thick and narrow the fairways, but that's even worse. Rounds take longer, and golfers will always choose to play it safe. Safe gets the lowest score, but is also boring. Dramatic U.S. Opens occur despite the course conditions, not because of them. No, I think there's a better way, and Golf Digest thinks so too. Or at least, someone does.

We get rid of bunker rakes. Bunkers are a joke to the average PGA Tour golfer. When they hit a bad shot, they want to end up in a bunker. When they're not sure if they can reach a short par 4 or par 5 in 2, they aim for bunkers. That's not what bunkers are supposed to be. Bunkers are supposed to be hazards, as in, you should be punished for going in them. An unmaintained bunker is something to be avoided, but unlike long rough, the opportunity for a great recovery still exists. It's just more difficult, and perhaps not every pro golfer could pull it off. So I say we take away the bunker rakes, trim back the rough to bring the bunkers back into play, and we see just how good the pros really are.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Does Pluto Have a Subsurface Ocean?

As it turns out, apparently you can't go five feet in the outer solar system without hitting a subsurface ocean. Europa's got one, Enceladus has one, and Titan, Ganymede, and Callisto probably have them. That's not even mentioning the list of objects that may have them, according to models of radioactive decay. Here's a list of those.

If you're observant (or read the title of this post), you'll notice Pluto on there. I've written about Pluto on several occasions now, as data from New Horizons slowly filtered through. The data return is done, but we still have a lot of things to learn from it. Like this, for example. Based on research of Sputnik Planitia, otherwise known as Pluto's "heart", it is very likely that Pluto possesses a subsurface ocean.

It is believed Sputnik Planitia was once a vast impact basin filled with a layer of nitrogen ice about 6 miles thick. That's fine, but what's interesting is that Sputnik Planitia is oriented almost directly opposite to Charon, the smaller partner in the Pluto-Charon double planet system. This position on Pluto's tidal axis is probably not a coincidence. After the impact, the basin filled up with nitrogen ice. This happened slowly, but as this gigantic mass of ice formed, it changed the shape of the planet, causing the basin to slowly wander towards its current, more natural position on the tidal axis. And as it moved, a series of faults and fractures would have appeared across the surface. And Pluto has these faults and fractures.

Where does the subsurface ocean come in? The sort of movement that Sputnik Planitia has undergone would be impossible without a subsurface, the model depends on it, and observations seem to back up the model. The model predicts faults and fractures, and there are faults and fractures.

Further proof comes from a second study. Those scientists calculated the odds of Sputnik Planitia forming in it's current spot at about 5%, and so also believe the feature has moved over time. They found that the impact which formed the basin would have weakened the crust, bringing the subsurface ocean close to the surface. This along with the accumulation of nitrogen ice would essentially roll the (dwarf) planet around. Without the liquid water, the ice of Sputnik Planitia would have to be several times thicker than currently believed, and that doesn't match up with our observations.

So there we have it. Pluto: likely possessor of a subsurface ocean. It's still not a planet though.



Monday, November 14, 2016

Golfing in Greenland

This is an interesting story about Nuuk Golf Club, in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland. Greenland has golf courses, but they're courses built into the snow. This place is grass, like a traditional course. There are courses further north, but not much, and those places probably don't have as harsh a climate. What's really surprising is how late they can play. In Greenland, golf can be played into October. The average Greenland golfer is probably a lot more hardy than most of us, but still, that is some determination.